1.2. ( )


..
1.2. ( )
.., . : . .. , , .
: . , .
: , , , , .
THE CONDITIONS OF COMPLAINT ACCEPTABILITY IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (PROBLEMS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE)
Tereshina A.N., postgraduate student. Place of study: Nizh-niy Novgorod state university named after N.I.Lobachevsky, law department, constitutional and administrative rights chair.
Annotation: In the article the conditions of complaint acceptability in the European court of human rights are analyzed. The author analyzes both norms of international law, and practice of giving of laying complaints by the citizens in the European court under human rights. Keywords: human rights, complaint, European human rights court, conditions of complaint acceptability.
46 , . 1998 .
.
, , , , . , , . , , . , . , .
10 :
1. , - .
2. , , - .
3. , - .
4. , - .
5. , .
6. 6 .
7. , .
8. .
9. .
10. ( ) .
, . , , , .
, , ratione personae ( ). , . , . » . , - , . , , - . . , .. 1 , ».
, . , . , -. » , . , , » (.3
1 Tumilovich v. Russia (dec.) no. 47033/99,22.6.99.
1'2010

1 ») , , .3 1 . . , » ». , , , , , . .
: » . . , . . . , , . . . » »2. 4 2003 » .1 . 35 . , » , . » 3 . , 4 , , . 5 , .
. , , . , , . - , , ( ), .
:
1. AO Uralmash v. Russia (dec.) no. 13338/03, 4.9.03.
2. Berdzenishvili v. Russia (dec.), 31697/03, 29.1.04
3. Denisov v. Russia (dec.), no 33408/03, 11.5.2004
4. Tumilovich v. Russia (dec.) no. 47033/99,22.6.99.
5. 24.07.2002 . 96 - » // . - 2002. 30. . 3013. . 10

.. ( )»
, . , - , .
, . .
, , .
.. ( )» .
,
. .. , ... ..
2 AO Uralmash v. Russia (dec.) no. 13338/03, 4.9.03.
3 24.07.2002 . 96 - » // . - 2002. 30. . 3013. .10
4 Berdzenishvili v. Russia (dec.), 31697/03, 29.1.04
5 Denisov v. Russia (dec.), no 33408/03, 11.5.2004