77-30569/296719


<! 77 - 30569. 0421100025.15511994-0408_
77-30569/296719
# 01, 2012 . .
330
» scremart@mail.ru
2020 . , : , .
. , : . , , , , 44% [2]. ,
- 3%. 2005 2009 , , 55 % 36 % [2].
, , . , . , , .
. , , - . , , . , , - .
. , . , - . , . . . , , . , , , , . . , , , , - .
, - , , . , , . .
. , , .
1. .
2. [1].
, . , , . . 1 [1].
1


( ) _ / () . 490 / . 700 . (490+640+650) / . 700 >0,5
( ) .. = (1/ - 1) . (590+690) / . 490 . (590+690-640-650) / . (490+640+650) <1,0*
_ . / . (290-690) / . 490 . (290-690+640+650) / . (490+640+650) >0,5
. _ . / . (290-690) / . 290 . (290-690+640+650) / . 290 >0,3
* 1,0
, . . , : , . () .
, . . [1].
, . . , [1].
. . 2 [1].
2


. . (260+250) / . 690 . (260+250) / . (690-640-650) 0,2 - 0,3
^-. . (260+250+240) / . 690 . (260+250+240) / . (690-640-650) 0,7 - 0,8
^. . 290 / . 690 . (290-216) / . (690-640650) 2,0 - 2,5
, . , [3], . , , , () , . .
, , . . . .
, , , , , . . , . . .
, , , , . , , [5]:
- ;
- .
() », , , , [4].
, , , .
, , . , , .
. . . .
, , . , . .
. , , , , . , . .
XXI .
,
.
. , .
. , XIX . , , .
, . . , .
, , , , , - , .

1. .., .., .. , .. , » // , 2002. - . 92-95.
2. .. // . 2010. 3. . 171-173.
3. - »: . http://www.exin.ru.
4. . http://www.unido.org.
5. Growth Competitive Index. http://time.dufe.edu.en/article/martin/3.pdf.
electronic scientific and technical periodical
SCIENCE and EDUCATION
__________El. .Vs KS 77 - 30569. -V042l 100025. ISSN 1994-0408_
Selection of rates and factors for ranging of the industrial enterprises by their innovative potential 77-30569/296719
# 01, January 2012 Knyazev N.S.
FSUE "Central Research Institute" Center "
scremart@mail.ru
Modernization of Russian economy and transition to innovative way of enterprise development are impossible without external investments. Because of weak development of venture capital it is necessary for the government to become an investor. However government support will be carried out only for those projects, which will have high feedback. The tool of an assessment of projects perceptivity is ranging the industrial enterprises by their innovative potential. For assessment of enterprises innovative potential it was suggested to consider rates of financial stability and liquidity of the enterprise, moreover there was a selection and a background of most important of them in the article. But except the rates, giving only a quantitative assessment of innovative potential, it was proved to take factors defining technological stability of the enterprise into account; they were human development, presence of competent approaches in management, regular perfection of the organization of production, commercialization of innovative production, a degree of a computerization.
Publications with keywords: the financial sustainability, public finance, technological potential Publications with words: the financial sustainability, public finance, technological potential
Reference
1. Sadovskaia T.G., Dadonov V.A., Drogovoz P.A., Financial analysis, Ser. Analysis of Business, Moscow, Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskii universitet imeni N.E. Baumana - BMSTU, 2002, pp. 92-95.
2. Saifullina S.F., The problems of innovative development of Russian enterprises, Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniia 3 (2010) 171-173.
3. <http://www.exin.ru>.
4. <http://www.unido.org>.
5. Growth Competitive Index, <http://time.dufe.edu.cn/article/martin/3.pdf>.